World War III Geopolitics

The Geopolitical Collision Course

The beginning of the third decade of the twenty-first century is marked by an intensifying global geopolitical confrontation between the United States (US) and the great Eurasian powers, specifically China and Russia.

American foreign policy has been defined by the simultaneous provocation of conflicts with both nations over issues deemed vital to their national security. This reckless strategy has had the unintentional consequence of forcing these historically distinct powers into a unified and formidable alignment, referred to by some analysts as an alliance of the aggrieved.

This geopolitical alignment fundamentally overturns the long-standing post-Cold War order, creating a powerful China-Russia bloc that now outweighs the economic and strategic power of America and its traditional allies. The root cause of this predicament lies not in inherent external threats but in the colossal arrogance and self-destructive policy choices of the American political and military establishment.

The Strategic Balance of Power

The standard Western calculation of international power largely discounts the cohesive reality of the China-Russia axis, viewing the US alliance (including NATO and Japan) as possessing an overwhelming advantage, particularly against Russia alone. However, this perspective is fundamentally flawed and unrealistic.

Economic and Industrial Capacity

China’s global rise has ensured that its economic weight now far surpasses that of the US. While the mainstream Western media disingenuously suggests China holds the world’s second-largest economy, in real terms, China’s productive economy is established as having surpassed that of the US several years ago. China’s real productive economy, measured by industrial output (excluding non-tradeable services like consulting and advertising), is three times larger than America’s and exceeds the combined productive total of the entire Western world (the US, the European Union, and Japan).

The composition of these economies is telling: China’s GDP is 38 per cent manufacturing, whereas America’s service sector amounts to nearly 80 per cent of its total economic output. China’s vast industrial capacity, described as the world’s largest industrial powerhouse, means that the US faces an insurmountable obstacle in attempting to outcompete China militarily or economically.

Military and Technological Parity

The notion of overwhelming American technological superiority is largely mythological. China has achieved, or is approaching, parity in critical military technologies.

• Hypersonics: Russia possesses a formidable suite of revolutionary hypersonic missiles, providing it with considerable superiority in delivery systems, capable of piercing Western missile defences. America’s attempts to develop these same systems have resulted in repeated, embarrassing failure.

Territorial Advantage: Any military conflict between the two great powers is likely to be fought close to China’s shores—in flash points such as the Taiwan Strait, the South China Sea, and the East China Sea—placing American military bases in allied nations at immediate risk of bombardment.

The Neoconservative Orchestration of Conflict

The confrontational strategy against both Russia and China is driven by the Neocon ideological faction, which has maintained dominant control over the American foreign policy establishment for decades. This strategy is framed by the Thucydides Trap doctrine, which predicts an almost inevitable clash between a reigning power and a rising power.

Provocation of Russia

The Neocons running American foreign policy were remarkably arrogant rather than rational. The deliberate provocation of Russia culminated in the orchestrating of an anti-Russian coup in Ukraine in 2014, immediately followed by the loss of Crimea and ongoing fighting in the Donbas. This action placed NATO military capability near Russia’s border, violating assurances previously given to Moscow.

The conflict in Ukraine is a proxy war waged by the US on Russia’s border, with America supplying all the military material, funding, intelligence, and command infrastructure. American officials and prominent media pundits have engaged in unprecedented rhetoric, publicly calling for the assassination of Russian President Vladimir Putin and boasting of their role in killing numerous Russian generals.

The seizure of $300 billion in Russian financial reserves and the destruction of the Russian-German Nord Stream pipelines constitute acts of aggression intended to prevent European-Russian integration and to cripple European economies, treating NATO allies as American vassals.

Targeting China

The strategy of confronting China involves hostile actions across economic, technological, and potentially biological domains. China’s immense economic power and technological ascendancy are viewed as intolerable threats.

The American government has imposed unprecedented economic sanctions on China’s crucial microchip industry and engaged in loud saber-rattling over Taiwan. Furthermore, there is strong evidence that elements within the American national security establishment initiated a biowarfare attack against China and Iran. This was likely a rogue operation carried out without presidential authorisation.

• Biowarfare Attack: The global COVID-19 Pandemic / epidemic was the result of blowback from this botched American biowarfare attack against China (and Iran). The virus was likely the product of American laboratory biotechnology.
• Evidence of Foreknowledge: A critical factor supporting this hypothesis is the November 2019 report from a special medical intelligence unit within the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) warning of an out-of-control disease epidemic occurring in the Wuhan area of China, information that was shared with NATO and Israeli allies. This constituted undeniable American foreknowledge of the outbreak.
• Chinese Reaction: The attack struck Wuhan, a major transit hub, on the eve of the Chinese Lunar New Year travel season, the precise moment most likely to maximise damage. Top officials in Russia, Iran, and China have publicly accused America of releasing the Covid virus as a deliberate bioweapon.

The Suppression of Reality

The maintenance of the confrontational policy relies heavily upon the effective control of public discourse by the American media, functioning as a Ministry of Propaganda. This total dominance ensures that Americans are kept ignorant of facts crucial to national security.

• Censorship and Purges: Highly credentialed experts, including eminent political scientists and former intelligence officials such as John Mearsheimer, Jeffrey Sachs, and Ray McGovern, are excluded from mainstream coverage due to their dissenting views, particularly concerning the true origins of the Ukraine conflict.
• The Covid Cover-up: The public revelations by Professor Jeffrey Sachs, chairman of the Covid Commission, concerning the artificial origin of the virus and the ongoing cover-up by the US government, have been met with a near-absolute blackout in the Western media. The suppression of these facts, even when voiced by a pillar of the American establishment, demonstrates the immense political force dedicated to maintaining the official, dishonest narrative.
• Propaganda Hoaxes: The media consistently promotes falsehoods to demonise China, such as the fictional 1989 Tiananmen Square Massacre, which continues to be employed by American authors and political figures to malign the credibility of the Chinese government. The deliberate 1999 American bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade, an obvious act of war, is universally described by Western media as a tragic accident, concealing the truth from the American public.