Speech by Jonathan Bowden

"I think ideas are inborn and you're attracted if you have any towards certain systems of thinking and sensibility and response from a very young age. I was always fascinated about meaning and purpose and philosophy and those elements of religion which impinge on real matters.

From very early in life I was attracted to vitalist authoritarian and individualist ideas. In my late teens I came across Frederick Nietzsche's writings in the 28 volume Carl Schle edition. Now those ideas predate my interest in them because I was drawn towards them in a particular way. As we look around as in this society now our people have an absence of belief.

They're very technically sophisticated. We still as a civilisation describe much of the rest of the world like a sort of empty technological colossus. But if you peer inside as to what we're supposed to believe and account for and what we think our destiny is individually and as a group there's a zero there's a nothingness there's a blank space for many people.

A hundred years ago Christianity was an overarching system in our society for those who went along with it socially for those who believed in it in a deep core way.

It's now virtually apart from small minorities invisible. It's extraordinary how a faith system that can shape a civilisation in part from a millennia and a half to two millennia can disappear. Those who say that certain ideas and ideals are impossible should look at what's happened to many of our belief systems. 100 years ago we had an elite we actually had a government we really haven't had a government in this country pretty much for about 100 years not an elite that knows what it wants and understands its mission in life understand its mission in life and that will hand on to people after it and that comes out of groups that exist before it.

We're ruled by essentially a commercial elite not an intellectual elite or a military elite or even a political one but a commercial profit and loss one and things have slid to such a degree now that if asked what does it mean to be British probably about 8 million of our people would say Posh & Becks - that's what it means for many people inundated to the tube and it vapid nonsense.

Now there are many complicated reasons why much of what western and White people used to believe in have gone down in the last century. Nietzsche prophesied that the fact of Christianity for many people (even though he welcomed it personally) would be a disaster for them why so because it gave a structure and a meaning and an identity.

A death without a context beyond it has no meaning. I believe that we're hardwired for belief philosophical and religious that we have to have it as a species and as a group. Look at the number of people who go completely to pieces when there is nothing outside and beyond them to live for beyond instantaneous things right in front of them.

In France they teach philosophy from the age of six, for the last couple of hundred years. In the Anglo-Saxon and Anglophone world there's been a hostility to theory there's been hostility to abstraction. There's been a complete reaction against a thinker called Thomas Hobbes who in many ways prefigures many events on the continent in the last century many many centuries before.

We had an extremely violent and convulsive political and dynastic revolution during the Cromwellian Interregnum and since then it could appear that we've had a quiescence in this society.

Yes we've had radical movements but the last major political movement to occur was the forming of a party by the trade unions in 1900 which grew into the Labour Party out of the Labour Representation Committee. But the idea that nothing can ever happen in Britain and that we're asleep is false.

English life is often politicised yes, but culturally English life has always been quite vital quite violent underneath the surface quite emotional. In our Renaissance, which is really the Elizabethan period we were renowned all over Europe for being vital, for being scientifically oriented, for having our minds completely open towards the future.

We were regarded as an aggressive and a powerful group that was coming of age. We created the greatest interconnected set of theater that the world has seen at that time since the Greeks.

We have lost our dynamism as a people, mentally and in every other way. Our people are still quite strong when it comes to the fist, and a bit of pushing and shoving, but what's (in the mind which) is lacking. A thug is not a soldier, and a soldier is not a warrior. And it's the strength which exists (in the mind) which is the thing that we have to cultivate.

I believe that strength comes from belief in things which are philosophically grounded and appear real to you. One answer that a critic would give to what I've just said, mentally speaking, is that it's so individualised now and so broken down and everybody sort of makes it up as they go along that's called heuristic thinking technically. And if everyone does make it up as they go along how will you ever have an organic culture again. But I think this is to misunderstand Western society on Western thought.

When Tony Blair says that tolerance and equality, and forbearance and Humanism are our virtues he is talking about and turning against us a tiny strand of our own civility which is part of our nature.

English and British people often don't like to impose their ideas on others often will avoid conflict until it becomes actively necessary. Many of these characteristics have been turned on us and used against us.

There's also a subtext to this country in the last 400-500 years and a lot of our Puritans and our obsessives and our fanatics and our extremists went abroad to found the United States that's where our Puritans went. Now many of them were Gradgrind, and a New Model Army banned Shakespeare in Newcastle, and flogged actors who dared to perform it.

This is England's greatest writer of course, so there's a sort of Taliban self-destructivity to that type of puritanism. But we could do with an element, if not of puritism, then of aestheticism of belief, and of asking foundational questions about what life is about.

To me this is what right-wing politics is really about.

The issues that people campaign on at the level of the street are not incidentals they are the expression of what's happened when you are ruled by liberal ideas. We've been ruled by liberal ideas for many centuries but in the most acute form in the last 50 years.

Liberal ideas say that men and women are the same and are interchangeable, that war is morally bad, that all races are the same, and should all live together, that a population that just exists in a country, is just a zone it's just an economic area, that everything's based on Nationalism and Materialism and is purely a calculation of economic self-interest.

Now there will be millions of our people who say "What is this chap talking about this is all abstraction." Go out there in the street and you see the example of a society that's based on these sorts of ideas.

Everybody is mouthing somebody else's ideas. Even Brown and Blair, they are coming out with in - their own way - in a 10th rate way certain of the ideologies that they knew when they were Edinburgh, or Oxford or wherever, because everybody speaks (unless they are a universal genius who takes hold of reality and reshapes it as a cosmos for themselves), everyone uses ideas that precede them and to which they are attracted.

Even to say I haven't got any ideas and it's all a load of nonsense is an idea. Everything is ideological. Every BBC news broadcast is totally ideological, and is in some respects a soft form of Communism which is what Liberalism is. The last speaker today is a man called Tomislav Sunic, and in his book Homo American which is about the American role in the world and of course America is the model for much of the development that's going on in every continent and in every group on earth - America is the model.

He said, and don't forget, he's an Eastern European, who lived under Communism. Middle class leftwing students in the 1960s used to hold their fist in the air and talk about communism. That these people have actually had to live under it and that is a totally different formulation in every respect.

What was a protest against mommy and daddy, and a desire to smoke a bit of pot, and do what you wanted, led to concentration camps and slavery and Disgenics and death. In certain Eastern European societies, what was just the mantra of adult babies out of their teens in the west, was terrorism in the east, and that's what people don't understand.

But in that book he said something very revealing he said that communism kills the body but liberalism kills the soul and that's exactly the case. We face a situation in the west where paradoxically spiritually we're in a far worse state than the people who lived under communism

This is the one of the great ironies, because amongst its mania and the rest of it communism froze things. It froze things glacially for 50 years in many respects, and much of the decay - the voluntary decay - much of which we've imposed on ourselves because of ideas, that successive generations of our leaders have adopted from themselves, and from others didn't occur to the same degree in the east.

The idea of self-denigration that patriotism is the worst evil on earth, that patriotism is one stop from genocide, that your worst group is always your group - always the worst group - this hasn't been institutionalised and internalised quite to the same degree. It's perverse, that peace and plenty can produce more decadence and decay than hardline Puritanism and terror, but that's what's happened. And in the east of course they now have the dilemma of westernisation, and that's joining us, because these are universal processes and they won't stop at the boundary between the old east and west Germany.

I was born in 1962. At the beginning of the 20th century this country ruled large stretches of the world. We're still a relatively powerful country, the statistics say we're between the fourth and the 20th most significant country on earth. But you also know on all sorts of registers, as you look around - that we don't believe in anything anymore - that we're in chaos, that a large number of our people are miseducated to the degree they hardly even know who they are.

That patriotism although it still exists in the blood and the bone and in the consciousness of many people, has been partially indoctrinated out of many. That people look behind them before they make an incorrect remark, even if they're in the wood, even if they're by themselves, they still look around because all these things are mental they're in the mind.

5% of all groups rule their own groups, that 80% always conform to the ruling ideology.

To be in one of those far right parties, is to be a demon in the minds of the conforming. It's being a Catholic under high Protestantism, it's something that's a threat, and the masses are like this, and they always have been.

In Eastern Europe the present regimes would have you believe that the dissident were loved. I tell you as a fact that under Soviet tyranny if you saw one of these dissidents walking towards you, you thought "Oh my God", And you did everything to pretend that he was an unperson, that he didn't exist, that you weren't in the street with him, in case there could be a man in a watchtower watching you.

Now everyone comes up and says "Oh we agreed with you all along", but in this society, liberalism has learned how to rule in a far more sophisticated way. Towards the end of the communist era in the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic, it was secret policemen were looking under people's beds for abstract paintings and jazz music and this sort of nonsense.

The west allows people who descent just to think in their own little boxes, and doesn't give a damn. Doesn't bother banning books, because 40% of the population can't read them anyway!

This is how liberalism rules. It doesn't allow the privilege of dissent because it disprivileges dissenting ideas, and if people can't think, and those ideas aren't worth anything anyway - it's invisible yes. And therefore you don't even need to "persecute".

You can put economic pressure on people so you've got a choice to be sort of decanted from bourgeois life, if you are manifest in public certain types of opinion, that's one of the pressures that's put on people. That's done deliberately, to stop people who have education forming the head, forming a brain, forming an elite for the fist, and that's done quite deliberately, so that leaders will be choked off.

If you go to a university, and Blair and Brown says everybody should go to a university, so the University of Slough has 28,000 students, and they do courses in golf, and tourism, and hairdressing. It's just mass training for a postindustrial society, to do repetitive tasks in trained environments, where they're being timed, and watched all the time.

Now because I believe it's thought which characterises our race, and our group more than anything else, I think that thinking is cardinal for many people. In 1968, there were convulsive riots all across the western world by left-wing western youth. They can raise hundreds of thousands in the streets - in Paris and elsewhere there were a million in the street. There also very large riots in the United States, on many campuses western people have always been convulsed by ideals and by ideas.

The idea that it's all in the past, that Fukayama said that the world has ended, that history has ended, and then September 11th Attacks happened - history never ends - things go on, and repeat themselves, and come back again, at times even more violently than before.

(Here's where Bowden get's it wrong...)

What our people are crying out for isn't really a religion or a belief system it's a form of mental strengthening in and of themselves to overcome the disprivileging mechanisms that don't allow them to think and also allow them to reconnect with core areas of identity.

(It is in-fact, exactly what our people need - a mental strengthening of, and within, Christianity)

I'm not a Christian and I never was, although I went to a Catholic school and they educated me very well, and almost every book in that library was by a dead White European male, and almost everything that one learned culturally from Christianity.

Schools outside of this structure do not retain a structure, and a discipline, and when you don't leave, when you're 16, and you don't even know what your name is, you can't read or write you speak like a Jamaican gangster you have no respect for what you are and who have you become and what you could become. Now we hear a lot about youth crime and we hear a lot about the uncontrollability of many people in our society. They're not controlled because there's no control up here (in the mind).

One of the cardinal weaknesses of the contemporary West is the feminization of all areas of life. Masculinity is a sacred thing, and yet it's been demonised and disprivileged in the Western world, regarded as just an excuse for brutality.

Masculinity is about self-control, it's about respect and power that's ventilated when it's necessary to use it.

The only way in which you would cure many of the problems that presently exist with elements of lumpen and criminality at all levels of life is to reintroduce national service with maximum harshness in the initial period. And a few would die because they'd be too obese to get through those tunnels and over those walls with serrated glass with the people screaming at them in an unpleasant accident but you would need to do that and the reason isn't physical the reason psychological. Some of our marines cried when the revolutionary guard in the Gulf took their iPods off them. This is why we decline. This is the Green Berets these are the Royal Marines. The Revolutionary Guard in Iran the Cooks Brigade which is the elite brigade which reports directly to the Supreme Leader Ahani couldn't believe it when they saw this sort of thing.

The postimperial British truly have a tremble in the lip but these things in the end are cultural and philosophical and psychological. Now our civilisation has had many religions, and many dispensations of thought, but one of the things that we have forgotten is that open-mindedness to the future and respect for evidence does not mean willingness, and an absence of certitude in what we are.

There was a thinker who was two and a who existed 2 and a half thousand years ago called Heraclitus and I'm my type of thinking is his linear descendant. He's a pre-socratic he's a sophist he begins right at the beginning of western thought when we actually write down what we think. He wrote a book on nature which Aristotle glossed and which is root survives in fragments. What did he believe he believed that everything is a form of energy the fire he called we would call it energy today that it exists in all forms of organic and inorganic matter. That thought and the sentience of nature is what we are. Nature has become sentient in us, which means we must incarnate natural law as a principle of being. It's called becoming in my philosophy.

The right, if you don't want to use that term, stands for nature, and for that which is given. What does that mean? It means conflict is natural and good, it means domination is natural and good, it means that what you have to do in order to survive is natural and good. It means that we should not begin every sentence by apologising for our part, or apologising for who we are.

Tony Blair I think made several interconnected apologies when he was premier, but he didn't apologise for being premier! He apologised for the Irish famine. Oh, I've got Irish bloods, but I'm not interested in apologies for the Irish famine. He apologised for the shoah, he apologised for slavery, he apologised for almost everything going, these are meaningless, as some of the groups that they were targeted on have the courage to say, it's just temporising sympathy.

In my philosophy sympathy multiplies misery, and if somebody's in pain in front of you, you give them some options, and if they can't get through it suicide's always an option.

Now what does nature believe? He believes that strength is moral glory, that courage is the highest form of morality, that life is hierarchical, that everything's elitist. There's a hierarchy in each individual, there's a hierarchy in every group of individuals, that the hierarchy between groups of individuals - inequality is what right-wing ideas really mean.

Right-wing ideas aren't just rage baiting a few Muslims, right-wing ideas are spiritually about inequality. The left loves equality. They believe we're all the same, and we must be treated the same, and they believe that their moral good which must be imposed.

Under communism Pol Pot shot everyone who read a book that he didn't approve of. Why did he do that? Because he wanted everyone to be the same, and everyone to think in the same way. Asiatics have a form of description it's called the tall poppy syndrome. They look at the plants they decide one's a bit out of kilter it's standing higher than the others so you snip it down so all are the same.

Pol Pot's not his real name by the way it's a joke name it means political potential when he was very young. Maoists wrote down this man has political potential - Pol Pot - and that's where he took it from. This man is a terroristic psychopath that when he took over his society with a teenage militia, high on drugs, and almost every other thing had been blitzed and was defenceless, he put into practice in a cardinal way, what many of these western idiots in the 60s with their fist in the air had been proposing.

He sat in Paris in salons listening to Christova listening to Satre listening to De Beavoir, and he imposed it impeccably like the cretin he was. The family is immoral, shoot all the Buddhist priests that have got people married, shoot people who are a bit too keen on marriage, shoot everyone who's read books about marriage, shoot everybody who's ever said marriage is a good thing. That's quite a pile of bodies and you haven't started that is communism in its rawest and its crudest form it's a sort of morality of bestiality essentially, and it's can't even impose equality.

Because in the communist societies of yesterday year, the elite will have its own shops, and its own channels, and they will have their own corrupt systems to keep their children out of military service, and so on. Just like Clinton's America, or Vietnam America before it, every elite in that sense will recompose, despite the figment.

Inequality is the truth, because nature is unjust, but also fair in its injustice - because there's always a balance. People who are very gifted in one area, will have grotesque weaknesses in another. People who are strong in one area, will be weak in another. People who are at the bottom within a hierarchy have a role, and have a place in a naturally ordered society, and will be looked after, because patriotism really is the only socialism - that's why the right appeals to all classes, and to all groups within a culture, because all have a place.

Now I believe that in the Greek civilisation, a peasant woman could kneel before an idol and can have a totally literalist, it's called metaphysically objectivist view of a religion. She believed in absolutely a fundamentalist in contemporary terms. And you can go right through the culture to extremely sophisticated intellectuals, some of whom were agnostics and atheists who supported religion, yes they did.

Charles Maurras is believed to be an atheist, but he led a Catholic fundamentalist movement in France. Why? Because if you are right-wing you don't want to tear a civilisation down just because you privately can't believe.

You understand the discourse of mass social becoming. What does a wedding mean? What does a death mean? What does the birth of a child mean, unless there's something beyond it?

(Again here, confuses Nature with God, and Theosis, confusing our God given 'Being', with his Nietzschean 'Becoming')

What does a war mean just killing for money, unless there's another dimension to it? We're reduced as right people first, and just as humans second, but we have to understand that belief is not a narrowness belief, is an understanding that there are truths outside nature and outside the contingent universe that's in front of us that are absolute.

The leftwing view that it's all relative and we make it up as we go along is false. Nature believes that we test ourselves here and now, in relation to what's going on before us, and the more primordial we are, the more we live in accordance with what we might become, the more we link with those concepts which are eternal, and that exists outside us.

(again, he misdiagnoses God & Theosis)

So, what appears with half an eye closed, to be an atheistic, a secular, and a modern system, if you switch around and look at it from another perspective is actually a form for traditional ideas of the most radical, the most far-reaching, the most reactionary, and the most archaic and primordial sort, to come back to come back from the past.

What the new rise of conception on the continent - The WW2 Consensus - has been is the reworking of certain ideas including certain ideas associated with Fascism, and their reworking so that they come back into modernity where we are now.

If you look at mass and popular culture, the heroic is still alive. It's still alive in junk films, in comic books, in forms that (cultural studies aside) intellectuals disprivilege. Why is the heroic treated at that level?

Because Liberalism can't deal with the heroic. It doesn't have a space for it in its ideology, so heroism should be destroyed.

Liberals think that they've destroyed the (right wing) ideas in this room, but they haven't. They've just displaced them into other areas, and they find new ways to come up with new ways of sympathising with the left emerge.

Much of popular culture involves the humiliation of men, who - iconographically - in films and so on, are authoritarian, hierarchical, and elitist. How much cinema have you seen with a man alone with a gun staring into the distance. It's the primordial American men? These are men who "fight against fascism ", they fight against authoritarian ideas of what the West was and can be. This is always the trick that they will use, the ideology of the Marine Corps to fight for a liberal, Humanist and a democratic purpose. That's the trick in every film, in every television program, in every comic, in every simple novel, in everything that the masses consume that isn't purely about sex or sport.

The heroic is there, and they always fight for liberal causes, and their enemies are always grinning Japanese generals, or Nazis used again, and again, and again, as a stereotype of a stereotype of a stereotype, to impose the idea that that which is core primal European is morally wrong.

There's one issue that I must speak about - the shoah. (Holocaust) Which is always brough out as a weapon they can use and it shuts people up instantaneously. And it does so because it impinges at quite a deep level on what White and European people think about morality, and this is a deep problem and it's a problem that all right-wing politics since the World War II, which was in reality a second European civil war the European equivalent of the American civil war in some ways in the century before, at which in a very complicated way it's both an attenuation and a reverse reflex, but this issue is very, very deep, and very complicated, and important and goes beyond methodologies about the figures for the number of purported victims involved.

Many western people feel that because it is generally a given in the society and culture that they're in that variants of our group have committed atrocities that our civilisation is therefore rendered worthless almost in its entirety except when it apologises before it even states that the right it has for it right to exist.

So every time Wagner is played on Radio 3, there will be there will be a sort of 30 second health warning, like on a packet of cigarettes - it's as literal as that. And because it's an ideology, it's got to it imposes itself.

Ideologies want to impose themselves like liquid finds its own level in a tank. If we were running things, if I was running the BBC it will be slightly different, those working at the BBC currently would hang themselves in their studios at the thought, but there's a degree to which the issue of the shoah is very cardinal, because it has caused intergenerational hatred, particularly in Germany and elsewhere.

It has caused a degree of self-hatred amongst our people, this is the worst type of denigration, because denigration that comes from without is rain that bounces off and can be withstood. You can put it up an umbrella, and get rid of it, but that which comes from inside is much more corrosive, much more deconstructive, much more disabling.

So, now we see every black group in the United States wanting a Holocaust museum about slavery in their own cities. And they say to a congressman "We want our museum." Well I don't if you want our votes you're going to get us our museum it's as straight as that.

Each group claims status for strength through victimhood, that's what we face. I can be strong because I've suffered, and I'm going to get back because I've been weak in the past, and my strength is revenge and I'm morally entitled.

And lots of our people think we were the primary, and primordial, and dominant group on earth for quite a long time, and now we're losing it in almost every area. Oswald Spangler wrote of the kind of the west after the great war, which of course was a Dysgenic war, which had a considerably destructive impact upon western rulership at every level. But as you look around, you sense the decline, and if you have a decline, and you have a desire to assert yourself to arrest the decline, and you have to apologise to yourself about even having the idea of assertion to arrest decline, you're not going to get anywhere are you? No, and that's what this weapon is.

Now my view is the following i'm technically a Pagan, and pagans believe that creation and destruction go together that love is fury that whatever occur and whatever occurs we don't have to apologise we step over what exists. There's a concept in my philosophy which is called self over becoming, where you take things which exist at a lower level that you feel uncomfortable with, and you sublimate them you throw them forwards you, ventilate them, you take that which you don't like and you transmute it, alchemically, psychologically, and intellectually, and you change it, and you step forward and say no to past humiliations, to past indoctrination, and degradation of the German people, who are cardinal to the European identity, both because of their cultural and linguistic specificity, and also because of the fact that they're at the heart of the European continent. If they have to apologise every day of the week for being what they are, our group as a whole can never assert itself.

The deputy chairman of the party that I was in, was asked about the Shoah on a Channel 4 program, and he said "Well, which Shoah are you referring to? Are you talking about the communist holocausts, many of which were inspired by Jewish ideas?"

Silence. A very radical statement for a contemporary BMP leader. But of course that's a clever answer, and it's a political answer, and it's a relativist answer. But my view is we've overcome all of these effects, and we will stride onto new forms of glory new forms of that which is impeccable.

We can rebuild cities again, every German city was completely destroyed. I have a friend of mine who's a well-known Roman who's almost 80 now his name is Bill Hopkins. After the war he served in Hamburg, and during the summer in about 1948 when he was in the RAF, he said all the British troops used to go often outside the city because the stench was so bad, because of all the bodies under the buildings that hadn't been reached, and hadn't been dragged down, or hadn't been put into light pit.

Everything has been rebuilt, because everything can be rebuilt, and built beyond what even existed in the past. So if somebody says to you, well I don't like the sound of that, you sound like a bit of a fascist to me, and I'd say "there's nothing wrong with fascism, nothing wrong with fascism at all". Everyone now got to reverse semiotics, and it runs against what they actually think, in order to convince people who don't agree with them anyway, because... democracy.

And I'm not a Democrat, i'm not a Democrat. When I supported the challenge in the party that I used to be in I did it for various reasons but to encourage greater democracy wasn't necessarily one of them for various reasons.

But authoritarianism has to have morality with it those who make an absolute claim and who don't live up to the nature of that claim or don't even begin to live up to the nature of it can't advocate authority. Mosley for example was regarded as above the movements that he led and therefore there was a degree of absolute respect even if people disagree with him totally on European nation and various other things because of the respect he had as a man.

And if you're to lead right-wing movements you have to have that degree of character character is integral to that type of authority he would say he will be selling a military commander never mind a political one. If it's not there you can't make authoritarian pledges and carry on in that sort of way because you're just involved in the grubby game which consists of Labor Liberal Tory and different versions of the same thing.

To make an absolute claim and not live up to it is worse than being in new labor because they don't pretend even though people have been fooled. So my view is that we must return again to sets of ideas which suit us that are cardinal for us that are metaphysically objective and subjective that see the flux and warp and weft of life and its complicatedness that know there are absolute standards upon which things are based. If we can't overcome the weapons which are used against us we will disappear these are the facts and therefore we have to do so in our own minds.

Every other group that's ever existed in human history has not had the albatross around it but it only remembers as a form of guilt and experation and as a mollock before sacrifices must be made their own moments of grief and of slaughter and of ferocity. They configure the world in another way.

When the Greeks sacked a city in internal warfare everyone had been enslaved but they did not remember when their bars sang of their victories that they had denied the human rights of other Greek citystates. No people can survive if it incorporates as a mental substructure an anti-hero heroic myth about itself.

This is why war is largely fought in the mind of the mob world. When Iraq was invaded and that regime was taken down, the precedents for everything which occurred have been done earlier in the 20th century. The removal of the top of the civil service trials for those involved their moral degradation and expiation, hanging in public put on YouTube so the world can see it.

A degradation of these villains not foreign statesmen to which we were opposed and against whom we fought but villains criminals that we must demonise and destroy. Why is it done? Because it destroys them morally in the mind.

An Iraqis thing and that Saddam was what a video why' you say that out well I've seen it on the TV that's what 80% of people are like. These extraordinary reversals because this is a mass age. In the past countries were ruled by elites you stopped off an elite put another elite in place now the masses are allegedly in charge so you have to indoctrinate the masses you have to stimulate them to fury.

Your enemy is not human they're beasts beast Mosovich beast human rights abuser genocidalist. Saddam in the Gulf for years now a demon a demon an anti-zionist ferocious apostate and so on. But most of the chemicals that he used in the three-way war Kurds Iranians on Iraqis fought to the first world war, level companies in Germany, in France, in Russia, in Belgium, in Britain, and in North America - provided that the gas was used by the Iranians as well and the curse falls on both sides but that is the complicatedness that people don't want to see. And it's also applicable to all groups.

An American colonel in Fallujah will be fighting in his own mind physically in a courageous way at the level of him in the ground with the sand around him and the flies in his eyes he's not thinking about grand theory he's thinking about getting through that tour of duty and getting back to the wife and the kids in Maryland or something that's that level.

We always have to understand that individual white Americans have absolutely no control over their elite just as we have no control over ours because they've gone to a global level and they think they've left us behind.

They think England and Britain's a puddle, and they can step out of it to universality. Well, you can't step out of its universe because if you're not rooted in something, you don't come from anywhere.

There are no roots that go down into the earth and you could be moved about like a weed which has very weak roots and just ripped out and somebody stronger will rip you out.

Here is the text reformatted into proper paragraphs, corrected for obvious transcription errors, re-punctuated, and adjusted to standard British English spelling and grammar while staying as close as possible to the original spoken meaning: So my role in all these right-wing parties and groups that I’ve been involved with, in one way or another, for the last fifteen years has been to preach inequality.

We used to hear people say, “He keeps saying people are unequal, people are unequal.” Seventy-five per cent of it is genetic and biological. Criminality is partly a biological predisposition; addiction to drugs is biological; intelligence is biological; beauty is biological; ferocity, or the predisposition to it, is biological; intellect is biological.

You can do a bit, but you’re born to be what you are, and we should celebrate what we were born to be, because we have created ninety per cent of the value in modernity. I am a modernist in many ways, because I believe we created a modern world that has since been taken away from what it could have been.

The modern and that which preceded it are not necessarily in complete opposition. If people with our thoughts and values ruled modernity, everything about this society would, on one level, be the same and, in every other respect, completely different. People would still drive contemporary cars; there would still be jets and supercomputers and so on, but the texture and the nature of life would be different in every respect.

How so? Firstly, cultures would be mono-ethnic. Secondly, there would be respect for the past glories of our civilisation. Thirdly, we would not preface every attempt to be strong by saying, “I’m sorry, I’m sorry for what we have done.”

We’re not sorry. Menachem Begin wrote in his autobiography – it’s called My Struggle or My Life, I forget which – that when he was asked about the massacres of Palestinian villages, which were certainly carried out by his paramilitary group, he said: “The sun comes up and goes down. It was necessary. We lived, we struggled, and they died. Israel lives, and we have to be the same.” I once spoke at a BNP meeting and a chap came up to me afterwards and said, “Um, you’re a bit right-wing, aren’t you?” He told me he used to be in the Labour Party. I said, “All right, that’s all right.” Then he said, “Don’t you think this party is a bit too nationalistic?” I pointed to the flags and said, “Well, what do you make of these?” He replied, “I’m just being honest.” I said, “Okay, at least you’re willing to stand here.” I asked him, “Why does it upset you?” He said, “Wouldn’t it be better if we presented ourselves as the victims?” He hesitated and then said, “I don’t want to go too far, but I’m obsessed with the case of the red squirrel.”

What he meant, in a very roundabout way, was that he wanted us to frame ourselves as the victims. The problem with that is it’s what everyone else does, and it can be done – there are plenty of White victims in this society now – but if you concentrate on pain and defeat, you will only breed resentment. Resentment and self-pity are the things to be avoided.

Stoicism should be our way; courage should be our way. When somebody pushes you, you push them back. When someone is false to you, you are false to them. When someone is friendly to you, you are friendly to them. You fight for your own country, your own group, your own culture, and your own civilisation at your own level and in your own way. And when somebody says, “Apologise for this or that,” you say, “No. I regret nothing.” As the French singer once said, “Je ne regrette rien.” It’s a good answer. I have no regrets. Life is a bullet that goes through screens. You hit the final screen and you’re dead. What happens after that, none of us know.

There is either a spiritual world – as all the cardinal metaphysical and objectivist religions of every culture and every group insist there is – or there isn’t. In my philosophy, the energy that is in us goes out into everything that exists, but there is an end after the end; it is not finite consciousness. That’s why I believe in cremation: I believe in fire and the glory of fire.

I remember when my mother was cremated. If you’ve ever been to a cremation, there’s a ghastly sinking feeling, and they draw a curtain because they don’t want you to see the fire – it’s an absolute furnace. I said to the attendant, “Look, I’ll even give you some money; I want to see the fire.” I told him I was a pagan and wanted to see the fire. He said, “Good Lord, are you one of those?” I thought he was going to ask for twenty quid more, but no – I was allowed to stand near the coffin as it went in.

The furnace door opens, the ecumenical or multi-faith curtain (the one with the peacock and various multifaith symbols) lifts, and you see this wall of flame – this amazing ball of flame like the inside of the sun. The oblong box slides in, the flames find every line, every plane, every mathematical contour of the coffin, and soon it is completely engulfed, and then the gate comes down. That, for me, is what life is like. That is what happens when a sun forms, when a galaxy forms, when one ends, when a life begins and when a life ends. That is life: fire, energy, glory, and thinking. Thinking is the important thing.

Being White isn’t enough. Being English isn’t enough. Being British isn’t enough. Know what you are. In this society, to read a book about your own culture is a revolutionary act. People are taught at school to rebel and to hate our high culture and our folk culture – “It’s all boring.” I once heard a Manchester club owner I vaguely knew – he ran Factory Records, very left-wing (that’s why he produced New Order and Joy Division, to make money) – say he didn’t like 1980s New Romantic music. The Radio 5 DJ asked why, and he replied, “Because it was too White – its base wasn’t Black enough.”

If you absorb those sorts of ideas, you will mentally perish over time, and you will physically perish as well. You have to know your own forms in order to deny the postulations of those who would deny them to you. Knowledge is power. Listen to classical music. Go to the National Gallery – it’s free; you can spend hours there looking at what we produced as a people.

That is what Muslims teach their children: to be totally proud of what you are, because identity is divine. Nature’s philosophy isn’t for everybody; it’s too harsh and forbidding for many. But it is a way of thinking that is reflexive and absolute. It is a primordially Western way of thinking. It enables people to be religious in the sense of recognising the sacredness of life, yet also open to fact, evidence, and science. It combines the things that lead to glory and that express themselves through both tenderness and ferocity.

I urge all White people in this era to look in the mirror and ask themselves: “What do I actually know about what I am?” If the answer is “not enough,” put your hand on that mirror and move towards greater knowledge of what you can become. We are all going to die; make use of the time that remains.

Greatness is in the mind and in the fist. The glory of our type is not behind us. We can be great again. But the first thing we have to do is to say: “I walk towards the tunnel, and I’m on my own, and I’m not afraid, and I have no regrets.” Thank you very much.