September 11th Attack Falsehoods

The Falsehoods and Reality of the 9/11 Attacks

TheSeptember 11th Attacks, drastically shaped world history and greatly diminished popular faith in the credibility of the government and media.

Over the years following the attacks, diligent researchers and courageous journalists have largely demolished the original narrative of those events, accumulating strong, perhaps overwhelming evidence that the Israeli Mossad together with its American collaborators played the central role in the attacks.

The total number of flaws in the official story is extremely long, likely numbering in the many dozens; agreeing upon only two or three of these items necessitates the total rejection of the official narrative.

The Demolition of the Official Narrative

The official account, which attributes the attacks to nineteen Arab hijackers, is demonstrably rife with physical and technical absurdities. The overwhelming weight of the evidence suggests the attacks were the work of a highly sophisticated organisation with access to advanced military technology, rather than a rag-tag band of Arabs armed with box-cutters.

Anomalies in the World Trade Center Collapse

The core technical claims regarding the collapse of the World Trade Center (WTC) towers are deemed implausible:

• It is extremely implausible that three huge skyscrapers in New York City suddenly collapsed at free-fall velocity into their own footprints after only two were hit by airplanes.
• The sudden total collapse of Building Seven, which was never hit by any jetliners, is also extremely implausible. A professional demolition expert, largely ignorant of the 9/11 attacks, immediately identified the filmed collapse of WTC Building 7 as a controlled-demolition.
• The debris from the destroyed buildings was analysed, detecting the residual presence of nano-thermite, a military-grade explosive compound. The clear presence of this military-grade explosive compound satisfies the requirement for proving the falsehood of the official narrative.
• A large civilian jetliner probably did not strike the Pentagon, as the scene left behind absolutely no wreckage and only a small hole. French intelligence may have influenced early reports suggesting the Pentagon was struck by a missile.
• The claim that an undamaged hijacker passport was found on a New York City street after the massive, fiery destruction of the skyscrapers is totally absurd.
• The claim that the top hijacker conveniently lost his luggage, containing a large mass of incriminating information, at one of the airports is equally absurd.

Immediately following the attacks, the supposed terrorist mastermind Osama bin Laden publicly denied any involvement, even declaring that no good Muslim would have committed such deeds. This denial of responsibility for the most successful terrorist attack in history is extremely suspicious, as the entire purpose of terrorism is to demonstrate capacity for inflicting serious losses.

The Official Cover-Up and Dissenting Intelligence

The testimonies of dozens of firefighters and rescue workers recorded hearing small, synchronized explosions just before the collapse of the buildings, entirely inconsistent with the official explanation that the collapses were caused by office fires. This powerful eyewitness evidence was totally ignored and excluded from the published government report.

Improbabilities in Physical Evidence

The official investigation and subsequent public messaging surrounding 9/11 are characterised by a deep and pervasive cover-up.

• The 9/11 Commission Report is deemed to constitute a cover-up.
• Highly regarded former US intelligence professionals have expressed extreme skepticism, including William Christison, who spent 29 years at the CIA, rising to Director of its Office of Regional and Political Analysis. Christison denounced the official report as a fraud and a cover-up, stating there is a strong body of evidence showing the official US Government story is almost certainly a monstrous series of lies. This extreme skepticism was never reported in the mainstream media.

Former Western intelligence figures, including former German Cabinet Minister Andreas von Bülow and former Italian President Francesco Cossiga, have suggested the CIA and the Israeli Mossad were responsible, claiming this fact was well known among Western intelligence agencies.

Identifying the Perpetrator and Motive

Once the official narrative is rejected, the question of who was responsible becomes paramount. The vast majority of evidence points to the Israeli Mossad and its American collaborators. The theory that the top political leadership of the Bush Administration, including Vice President Dick Cheney and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, organised the attacks (the inside job scenario) is dismissed as beyond ridiculous and lacking any solid evidence.

The Role of Israel and Mossad

The case against Israel and its Mossad intelligence service is overwhelmingly strong in motive, means, and opportunity.

• Motive and Benefit: Israel was the only country in the world that clearly gained as a result of the 9/11 attacks and America’s military reaction.
  • Prior to 9/11, Israel was in a desperate situation, fighting for its life against the massive waves of domestic terrorism constituting the Second Palestinian Intifada. Major Muslim powers like Iraq, Iran, Syria, and Libya were supporting the Palestinians.
  • The attacks immediately mobilised the world’s sole superpower against Arab and Muslim terrorist movements.
  • Soon after 9/11, a secret military plan came into being under which America would attack and destroy seven major Muslim countries, including Iraq, Iran, Syria, and Libya, all of Israel’s strongest regional adversaries.
  • Israel’s strategic and economic situation improved enormously while America expended trillions of dollars attacking Israel’s enemies.
• Means and Foreknowledge: Israel possesses a track-record of remarkably bold high-level assassinations and false-flag attacks against other countries, including America and its military.
  • Immediately following the attacks, the US government arrested approximately 200 Israeli Mossad agents. Many of these agents had been based in exactly the same geographical locations as the purported 19 Arab hijackers.
  • New York City police arrested some Mossad agents while they were publicly celebrating the 9/11 attacks and producing a souvenir film of the burning World Trade Center towers. One arrested agent told officers, We are Israelis… Your problems are our problems.
  • Other agents were caught driving vans containing explosives or their residual traces.
  • Most agents refused to answer questions or failed polygraph tests, but under massive political pressure, all were eventually released and deported back to Israel.

The considerable number of zealously pro-Israel Neocons situated just beneath the public surface of the Bush Administration—including Libby, Wolfowitz, Feith, and Richard Perle—could have greatly facilitated both the successful organisation of the attacks and their effective cover-up and concealment.

The Discrediting of the Truth Movement

The 9/11 Truth movement failed to convey its message in a politically significant way to the American public. The widespread doubts about the official story were left unresolved, creating a vacuum.

• The Inside Job Fallacy: The movement’s leadership feared accusations of anti-Semitism if they pointed toward Israel, so they failed to name any plausible culprit. This vacuum was filled by useful idiots who shouted inside job! while pointing an accusing finger toward Cheney and Rumsfeld, which did much to discredit the entire movement.
• Fringe Theories: The movement also lost credibility due to the promotion of novel and implausible theories by loud and energetic advocates. These bizarre theories include claims that the World Trade Center was destroyed by nuclear explosions or mysterious energy weapons, or that no actual planes were involved in the attacks and the images seen were merely holograms.
• Deliberate Sabotage: This promotion of implausible conspiratorial theories may have been deliberately encouraged by pro-establishment operatives engaging in deceptions intended to discredit the entire 9/11 Truth community. These fringe theories tend to obscure the larger picture and confuse casually-interested onlookers, rendering them counter-productive to the overall goals of seeking truth.