The Fallacy of White Privilege

The concept of 'White Privilege' insists that individuals of European descent inherently possess unearned advantages solely by virtue of their race, with some believing the blood line is inherently poisoned and must be erased.

Those pushing the 'White Privilege' narrative attribute the characteristics of a community to its individual members based on racial identity, a practice which is ironically racist.

'White Privilege' is a notion completely lacking methodological empirical backing, originating as a emotional anticdotal narrative, rather than a statistically analysed hypothesis.

Its proliferation serves as a tool within an anti-White ideology and multicultural agenda.

Philosophical and Ideological Underpinnings

The genesis of the 'White Privilege' narrative is found in the ideological nexus of postmodernism and neo-Marxism. Postmodernism, a philosophical movement characterised by scepticism and a rejection of grand narratives, ideologies, and universalisms, including objective notions of reason, human nature, and absolute truth, converged with Marxism following the latter's perceived failures.

This alliance represents a sleight of hand, transforming Marxist class warfare from a struggle between "working-class versus capitalists" to an "oppressor versus oppressed" paradigm.

Within this framework, hierarchies are fundamentally redefined as consequences of power differentials, thereby rendering every hierarchy a tyranny, a concept termed "the patriarchy".

This perspective asserts that facts themselves are not objective but are constructs of a "White dominated male patriarchy" designed to impose a tyrannical structure. Human nature is considered merely a social construct, allowing for its arbitrary redefinition.

The aim is to justify the use of power, obviating the need for civilised debate or adherence to factual constraints.

Critiques and Counterarguments

Competence over Power:

Functioning Western societies, in contrast to tyrannical systems, base their hierarchies primarily on competence, not solely on power. The demonstrable functionality of societal systems, such as public transport, serves as pervasive evidence that these hierarchies are largely effective.

The Nature of Suffering:

Suffering is intrinsically linked to the self-conscious human condition, being an inherent aspect of existence rather than merely a consequence of sociological oppression. This contrasts with the Marxist view that suffering is solely attributable to oppressors.

Marxist Outcomes:

The historical application of Marxist principles in various cultures, such as the Soviet Union, China, and Cambodia, has resulted in the deaths of tens of millions, demonstrating that the ideology is rooted in rebellion and hatred, not compassion. The assertion that "real communism was never tried" is dismissed as delusional arrogance.

Misguided Diversity:

The postmodern claim that diversity is achieved by group (racial, ethnic, sexual) is incorrect. The idea that there are more differences between groups than within them is a fundamental racist concept. Genuine diversity, essential for effective work teams, stems from individual differences in intelligence, temperament, and skills, which are selected to meet specific business requirements.

Majority Privilege vs. White Privilege:

Many of the purported "White privileges" are, in fact, attributes of belonging to a cultural majority within one's own society. For instance, the ability to primarily associate with one's own race or to expect widespread representation in media is a common experience for majority groups globally, not exclusively a "White" phenomenon.

Weaponisation of Empathy:

Contemporary cultural programming, including entertainment media, is systematically employed to deactivate White racial survival instincts and to cultivate outgroup empathy.

This is achieved by pathologising natural racial instincts and prejudices through the contrived notion of "racism". Narratives are constructed to justify the transference of wealth and power to non-native populations, often through channels such as charities, international aid, affirmative action, and diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programmes.

Inversion of Hero and Villain:

Western myths and stories are frequently revised to recast the White man as the villain and his historical adversaries as heroes, leading to the "racial other" assuming the role of protagonist.

This ideological shift is a suicidal trajectory, rooted in a synthetic moral system that stigmatises any action serving the interests of one's own group over the "human collective".

This cultural phenomenon extends to the portrayal of White figures in media, where strength and dignity are punished, while sickness and degradation are rewarded.

The narrative suggests that the White race is incurably sick and can only find meaning by facilitating the rise of the "racial other," acting as an incitement to White racial self-erasure.

Conclusion

The notion of "White privilege," stemming from philosophically flawed and ideologically driven constructs, is a dangerous and manipulative tool. It aims to induce guilt and shame within the majority White population, manipulating it into accepting a future it would otherwise reject.

Weaponised narratives and Anti-Western Programming in media often draw on various sources and techniques to achieve specific psychological and social effects, such as eliciting guilt, defeating self-preservation instincts, and fostering 'empathy for the other'.

These narratives are a form of mass psychic conditioning program and predictive programming, designed to shape perception and behavior, often bypassing rational thought by accessing emotional and instinctual cores.