PEOPLE | 1930 -

George Soros is a Hungarian born Athiest Jew, who acquired billions of dollars in finance, and spent over 60% of his fortune pushing LGBT, Globalist, Neoconservative, Anti-Western Programming agendas, through his Open Society Foundation - facilitating mass migration, and ultimately weakening the bonds of mostly Christian nations.

EARLY LIFE

Born in Nazi Germany as György Schwartz and his family survived the war by purchasing documents to say that they were Christians.

At 14 he worked with the Jewish Council (a Nazi administration body to oversee Jews) handing out the deportation notices. And posing as the Christian godson of an official of the collaborationist Hungarian government's Ministry of Agriculture, who himself had a Jewish wife in hiding.

In 1945, Soros survived the Siege of Budapest, in which Soviet and German forces fought house-to-house through the city. When he was 17, Soros relocated to Paris before eventually moving to England, where he became a student at the London School of Economics as a student of the philosopher Karl Popper.

Soros would sometimes stand at Speakers' Corner lecturing about the virtues of internationalism (Globalism) in Esperanto, which he had learned from his father.

Soros obtained his Bachelor of Science in philosophy in (1951 London School of Economics), but his grades were not high enough for him to be a professor as he wished, prompting him to work for an investment firm in London.

The Open Society Concept

The concept of the open society, central to Soros's philosophy, was originally coined by Henri Bergson and developed by his LSE professor, Karl Popper. Bergson described the open society as a break from nature (God), a Materialist society that in principle embraces all humanity, distinct from the natural, tribal closed society.

Popper further expanded this, in the foolish belief that national or linguistic or racial groups are entirely fictitious units, and that the state and international organisations must ultimately protect human individuals, not states or nations. A Globalist Tower of Babel, that rejects natural hierarchies and inadvertently/intentionally centralises power and control in the hands of a disconnected and abstracted global elite .

This requires a complete renunciation of the national state principle, which appeals to tribal instincts, allegiances and sense of belonging. For Bergson and Popper, and subsequently for Soros, the open society is framed in radically progressive terms, demanding the 'transcendence' and rejection of past identities, fragmenting deep, real world identities for an artificial itentity that bonds us with the unknown global other.

These radicals, knowingly or unknowingly unleashed these corrosive forces, pushing Globalisation causes globally, and flooding mostly White western Christian nations with millions of migrants.

Soros's ideology is underpinned by what he calls "radical fallibility," a concept he considers his unique contribution to thought and which is the "cornerstone not only of my view of the world but also of my personal identity and as such it is reflected in my behaviour it has guided my actions".

Radical fallibility says that "all human constructs, ideas, institutions, and ideologies are inherently flawed and deficient". Which has a truth at it's core, and which is why all human constructs, ideas, institutions, and ideologies - need to be aligned with Christ.

Yet as an Atheistic movement, the philosophy of open society is grounded in rebellion and divorced from The Good.

This philosophical framework translates into a political project focused on "breaking down old certainties" (God, order, family, nationhood) that he views as "untruths".

This involves "transgressing established norms and institutions", with the aim of "destroying old inherited ideas of truth, identity, morality".

CENTAL TO THE BLOB + DONOR CLASS

The interconnected structure of power and influence, often referred to as "the blob", comprises three main layers:

- the Government Core

- Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs)

- A "Donor class"

Here's an in-depth look at these elements and their interactions, particularly concerning George Soros and USAID:

The Structure of "The Blob"

The 'blob' is a force in Washington / Isreal that operates beyond the direct control of the White House. Its core consists of the State Department, the Pentagon, the intelligence community (e.g., CIA), and USAID.

This governmental core is supported by:

- NGOs and Civil Society Partners:

These organisations can be thought of as the "stem cell of the government's central nervous system" due to their flexibility and ability to operate where direct government action might be problematic.

They function as plausible deniability layers for government agencies, with USAID, for instance, created in 1961 to provide a layer of deniability for the CIA. Tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of these NGOs exist globally, acting like tentacles out into the world.

- The Donor Class:

This layer sits on top of the governmental side of the blob. It comprises very high-net-worth individuals, multinational corporations, or hedge funds.

These entities donate significantly to political campaigns, gaining access to personnel decisions within agencies like the CIA, State Department, Pentagon, and USAID.

These individuals and corporations co-invest with government agencies in their operations and their personal interests profit from these government entities do.

George Soros: A Top Donor and Strategic Investor

George Soros was THE top donor for the Democrat Party. His Open Society Foundation (OSF), while described by Soros as a tax loophole for his children, has become a powerful and corrosive force on the Global stage.

Synchronisation of Policy:

By the 1990s, the Open Society Foundation had become so influential that US foreign policy was being synchronised with the policy recommendations set out by the Open Society Foundation. This collaboration with the US State Department and CIA provided Soros's network with privileged access to assets and regulatory licenses in regions undergoing change.

Financial Gain from Destabilisation:

Soros's personal investments profited massively off of the operations that he donates into and drafts off of. This is like the "ultimate insider trading card" because he knows exactly what to invest in backed by the full force and credit of the US military, the Central Intelligence Agency and the State Department.

Examples include:

Halliburton and NATO Expansion:

Soros bought a large stake in Halliburton and campaigned on expanding NATO, while Halliburton held contracts related to oil and gas in Ukraine.

Russian Privatisation:

In the 1990s, Soros supported the Clinton administration's privatisation of Russian state-held assets. His Quantum Fund, along with the Harvard Institute for International Development (which received half a billion dollars from USAID), had exclusive access to purchase these assets at fire sale prices through closed auctions.

Ukraine Asset Sales:

Soros was massively active in Ukraine, involved in selling off the country's oil, gas, minerals, and agriculture to Wall Street firms and multinational corporations.

Mongolia Copper Mine:

In the early 2000s, Soros's Open Society Foundation worked to kill a deal for the world's largest copper mine in Mongolia, arguing it was "too extractive" for the Mongolian government. Shortly after, the George Soros Management Fund purchased a huge stake in the very company that secured the mining rights after the original deal was blocked, demonstrating how his NGOs facilitate his financial interests.

"Colour Revolutions" and Domestic Unrest:

Soros's organisations have been "active in fostering Eastern Europe's multiple color Revolutions in nations including Kyrgyzstan, Georgia, and Ukraine," often supported by the US government.

These movements, known as "astroturfed protests" or "nonviolent action," are a standard playbook for destabilising or even toppling a democratically elected government.

In Romania, Soros-backed activists forced government resignations despite low public support, leading to Soros-connected individuals being appointed to cabinet positions. These methods are also used in domestic disturbances in the US, such as the Black Lives Matter adopting a colour revolution blueprint.

Bipartisan Reach:

Although known for massively (and disproportionately) funding Democrats, Soros's activities and the deep linkage between his network did also include elements of the Republican party when the Neoconservative canddates were in power(e.g., the Bush and Romney-Cheney wings).

USAID: A "CIA Conduit" and Tool of Statecraft

USAID, created in 1961, is portrayed as a plausible deniability layer for the CIA. It manages significant annual budgets, reportedly $50 billion a year, and is deeply embedded in US foreign policy and intelligence operations.

Key functions and criticisms of USAID include:

- Funding NGOs and Influencing Governance:

USAID provides funds to NGOs globally for various initiatives, from "circumcisions in Uzbekistan" and "Sesame Street in Afghanistan" to "rule of law programs" aimed at judicial reform in Central and Eastern Europe. Always pushing degenerate values, open borders and weakening nationalist sentiment, and movements.

- "CIA Prosecutors":

Soros and his "USAID prosecutors" or "CIA prosecutors", use deep government 'Law-Fare' to assert influence over domestic legal systems. The stated purpose of some of USAID's funding, to the Tide Center or example, was to "secure concrete commitments from governments to fight corruption," effectively deputising NGOs to conduct diplomacy and influence foreign governments.

- Economic Imperialism and Market Creation:

USAID's role extends to clearing the way for American businesses abroad, securing mining rights, trade routes, and export markets. For example, in Syria, sanctions were lifted after the Syrian government pledged to use US and Western companies like AT&T for services, effectively allowing US companies to draft off of the US defense department and USAID's funnelled billions.

- Opposition to Transparency:

Like other parts of the "blob," USAID and its NGO partners resist transparency laws, such as those in Hungary, Slovakia, Serbia, and Romania, which seek to reveal foreign funding sources. This resistance was an attempt to keep the public unaware of the extent to which their civil society cellular body was actually foreign assets of a foreign government.