ADL

The Anti-Defamation League

The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B’nai B’rith, founded in 1913, is a very formidable Jewish activist organisation. It functions as a central organ of the organised Jewish community and commands great influence over the media and other important elements of American society.

The ADL is widely feared in elite circles, and few organisations so terrify powerful Americans.

The ADL operates as a privatised version of the country’s secret political police, monitoring and enforcing ideological doctrines on behalf of Jewish groups, akin to the Stasi for the Communist rulers of East Germany. Its central goal appears to be the maintenance of overwhelming Jewish control in a society that is 98% non-Jewish. The organisation’s power is almost entirely based upon a compelling set of falsehoods regarding its origins and activities over the decades since its founding.

The Origins of the ADL: The Leo Frank Case

The ADL was founded just over a century ago with the central goal of preventing a Jewish rapist and killer from being held legally accountable for his crimes. The ADL is inseparable from the Leo Frank case that inspired its creation. The initial impetus had been the vain national effort to save the life of Leo Frank, a young Southern Jew convicted of murder.

The standard narrative widely presented in media maintains that Frank, a Jewish factory manager in Atlanta, Georgia, was unjustly accused and that his 1915 lynching was a particularly horrifying example of American anti-Semitism. However, the actual facts of the case were quite different.

The Facts of the Frank Case

In 1913 Georgia, a 13-year-old pencil company worker named Mary Phagan was last seen alive visiting the office of factory manager Leo Frank to collect her weekly paycheck.

Frank, the wealthy young president of the Atlanta chapter of B’nai B’rith, was eventually arrested after her raped and murdered body was found in the basement. After the longest and most expensive trial in state history, Frank was quickly convicted and sentenced to death.

The case against Frank steadily mounted. Frank was the last man known to have seen the young victim and repeatedly changed important aspects of his story.

Numerous former female employees reported his long history of sexually aggressive behaviour toward them, especially directed towards the murdered girl herself.

Frank refused to take the stand at his own trial, thereby avoiding any public cross-examination of his often changing account. Furthermore, two separate firms of experienced private detectives hired by Frank’s lavishly-funded partisans reluctantly concluded that Frank was guilty as charged.

Jim Conley, Frank’s black janitor, came forward and confessed to having been Frank’s accomplice in concealing the crime. Conley testified that Frank had regularly enlisted him as a lookout during his numerous sexual liaisons with his female employees, and after murdering Phagan, Frank had offered him a huge sum of money to help remove and hide the body in the basement.

Two notes written in crude black English, discovered alongside Phagan’s body, were agreed to have been written by the murderer in hopes of misdirecting suspicion. The spelling and choice of words strongly suggests an educated while attempting to imitate that style, thereby implicating Frank.

Financial Corruption and Media Control

In the period following Frank’s conviction, many of America’s wealthiest and most influential Jewish leaders began mobilising to save him.

The total expenditures by Frank supporters may have been as high as $25 million in present-day dollars, quite possibly more than any other homicide defence in American history before or after.

A leading donor privately admitted that much of this money was spent on perjury and similar falsifications. This vast ocean of pro-Frank funding and the sordid means for which it was often deployed meant there existed a mountain of demonstrably fabricated evidence and false testimony in favour of Frank, and no sign of anything similar on the other side.

Albert Lasker, the unchallenged monarch of American consumer advertising, ultimately provided the lion’s share of the funds for Frank’s defence and focused his energies upon shaping the media coverage surrounding the case.

Lasker privately admitted that a large fraction of the massive funding had been spent on perjured testimony, and there are strong hints that he explored bribing various judges.

Lasker and Frank’s other major backers were guilty of serious felonies. Lasker, upon his first personal meeting with Frank, perceived him as a pervert and a disgusting individual, and hoped that after he managed to free Frank, the latter would quickly perish in some accident.

A huge wave of unremitting pro-Frank propaganda soon began appearing across the country in both local and national publications, with scarcely a single word told on the other side of the story.

The New York Times, in particular, began devoting enormous coverage to the previously-obscure Georgia murder case. With Frank’s innocence being proclaimed nationwide, a long list of prominent public figures were persuaded to demand a new trial, including Thomas Edison, Henry Ford, and Jane Addams.

The Inverted Narrative and Racial Implication

Frank’s attorneys exploited the comparison between Frank, the wealthy Jewish businessman, and Conley, the semi-literate black janitor, indulging in the crudest sort of racial invective against his black accuser.

Frank and his allies continually attempted to implicate a series of different innocent blacks by planting false evidence and using bribes to solicit perjured testimony.

The theory that Conley, a semi-literate black menial, had brutally raped and murdered a young White girl, and that the legal authorities then conspired to set him free by supporting a scheme to frame an innocent White businessman, defies rationality.

The clear facts indicate that there was indeed a massive miscarriage of justice in Frank’s case, but virtually all of it occurred in Frank’s favour.

The Frank case set a remarkable precedent in Southern courtroom history with the testimony of a black man playing a central role in a White man’s conviction. It may have been as important to the history of black progress in America as such landmark legal verdicts as Plessy v. Ferguson or Brown v. Board.

However, because Frank was Jewish rather than Christian, this remarkable history has been completely inverted for over one hundred years by Jewish-dominated media and historiography.

Jewish money and Jewish media established Frank as a Jewish martyr who effectively usurped the victimhood of the enormous number of innocent blacks who were killed both before and after him.

The Fearsome Power of the ADL in Modern Society

The ADL of B’nai B’rith has great influence over the media and other important elements of American society. Its reputation is fearsome, and powerful figures such as Mel Gibson, Rupert Murdoch, and Tom Perkins have been forced to acquiesce to its demands or suffer career destruction.

The ADL has successfully gained the role of content gatekeeper at some of America’s largest Internet companies, helping to determine what may or may not be said on platforms such as Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter. The organisation’s involvement in illegal domestic espionage and its sordid past make this choice highly questionable.

A History of Illegal Espionage

The true recent history of the ADL is a sordid and disreputable tale.

In January 1993, the San Francisco Police Department raided the Northern California headquarters of the ADL, discovering that the organisation had been keeping intelligence files on more than 600 civic organisations and 10,000 individuals, overwhelmingly of a liberal orientation.

An inspector estimated that 75% of the material had been illegally obtained, much of it by secret payments to police officials.

This massive operation clearly amounted to the largest domestic spying operation by any private organisation in American history. ADL agents across the country targeted over 1,000 political, religious, labour, and civil rights organisations, with the New York headquarters of the ADL maintaining active dossiers on more than a million Americans.

The ADL was the actual source of the highly controversial 1960s surveillance on Martin Luther King Jr, which it provided to FBI Director J Edgar Hoover.

This illegal domestic espionage activity appears to have been directed against almost all groups and prominent individuals suspected of being insufficiently aligned with Jewish and Israeli interests.

Some of the illegal material found in the ADL’s possession even raised dark suspicions that it had played a role in domestic terrorist attacks and political assassinations directed against foreign leaders.

Despite this long history of criminal activity, the resulting government charges were quickly settled with merely a trivial fine and a legal slap on the wrist.

This demonstrated the near-total impunity provided by massive Jewish political power in modern American society. Granting the ADL oversight over the largest Social Media platforms amounts to implementing George Orwell’s Ministry of Truth on behalf of Jewish interests.